And, the fictitious creep primary axial force is also 989kN. But, when I check the result the creep deformation at 10000 days is only 0.989 of the axial load deformation. So, I expected that the creep deformation at 10000 days to be 1.3938 times higher than that of axial load deformation. I used CEB-FIP 1990 model for the creep analysis and checked creep coefficient at 10000 days with the start loading age of 30-day (i.e. The simple span structure is added to the model at age 30 with the axial load of 1000kN and the duration of 10000 days to see the creep deformation at 10000 days. I did a simple staged modeling to see the deformation due to creep. ![]() I have a question about the creep deformation and the relationship with the creep coefficient.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |